According to @ai_9684xtpa, the trader closed a nearly four-day ETH long 17 hours ago with $1.285M realized profit, down from a $5.3M peak unrealized gain. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Dec 6, 2025. He then opened two additional ETH longs on the dip that both lost, giving back about $230k, for a cumulative $1.055M net profit across three ETH long attempts. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa. ETH broke above $3,200, and high-frequency trader address 0xa43d75213160AFF6db3b9761Dd5AC4FB4fA57D28 still holds 19,628.65 ETH worth $63.22M with an average entry of $2,950.23, ranking as a Top 2 ETH long on Hyperliquid. Source: @ai_9684xtpa and hyperbot.network/trader/0xa43d75213160AFF6db3b9761Dd5AC4FB4fA57D28. The floating profit on this position fully covers losses from 17 trades over the past three days. Source: @ai_9684xtpa. Traders can monitor liquidity, funding, and liquidation risk around the $2,950 to $3,200 zone given the account’s Top 2 ETH long status on Hyperliquid. Source: @ai_9684xtpa and hyperbot.network.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH fell to 3,200 dollars as a trader who switched to a new address opened large longs near the start of the dump, source: @ai_9684xtpa; hyperbot.network. The new address holds 7,595.25 ETH in long exposure with about 1.858 million dollars in unrealized losses, source: @ai_9684xtpa; hyperbot.network. The trader also reopened longs on the original address about 9 hours earlier, now holding 7,040.16 ETH with about 1.232 million dollars in unrealized losses, source: @ai_9684xtpa; hyperbot.network. Combined unrealized losses across the two addresses reach roughly 3.09 million dollars while both positions remain open, with the wallets referenced as 0x95815F5b... and 0x93c841b..., source: @ai_9684xtpa; hyperbot.network.